Dollar ReDe$ign Project

It's Time to ReBrand the Buck

Astonishing! The 'Art' of Bank Note Design (by committee) : Treasury Dept Podcast

Watch this snoring podcast from the Treasury Dept on how the new $100 bill was 'designed' (by committee). It's astonishing the amount of time and effort the Bureau and the Treasury spent on developing their ideas. Really. But what did the research show? That people can't deal with change and are unable to let go of the past. Get comfy now because this really is a 'design for dummies' show and tell. It's also important to note that not one actual designer was consulted in the project's development, in fact the printer was left in charge of that responsibility. Need we say any more.

Filed under  //   Federal Reserve   New $100   Treasury Dept  

Susan Witt : What is Money? : BerkShares Local Currency

Susan Witt of the EF Schumacher Society talks about the nature of money and the benefits of local currency. Visit http://www.BerkShares.org to learn more.

The Opposition Strikes Back : Treasury Dept : Dollar ReDe$ign – Not!

In response to our recent call for entries, the Treasury Department just sent in some quick fix solutions. Utilizing a rogue's gallery of dead Presidents and Masonic iconography, their ideas are vintage in every respect. Clearly this is a joke but unfortunately the Bureau for Printing and Engraving was unavailable for comment at press time. And where's the $1 bill? Curious ... 

(download)

New $100 Bill – A Hard Act to Follow

Today, April 21, 2010, the Treasury Department of the United States of America announced the launch of the new $100 bill - Woooo-hooo! What a doozy! ;) Wow, the ‘design‘ department really went to town this time. Clearly feeling the heat from the DRP the Treasury Department has obviously spent the last year passing round PowerPoint presentations outlining their planned retaliation. Pathetic really that this is all they could come up with, I mean, Joe-Criminal is always going to be ahead of the technology curve when it comes to finding ways to work this shit around - ie counterfeiters will always find a way to break the code. But really who gives a hoot – sure security is important, but what really counts is what our currency has come to represent, which honestly is Jack-Shit. And until the Treasury Department, the Federal Reserve, and the rest of those folks on Capitol Hill realize that this is a brand issue – not a paranoid security driven issue – the quicker we, the People, will get back what we deserve – our homes, our cars, our savings, our livelihood, and most importantly our individual self-respect. Period.

Watch this space. New Dollar ReDe$ign Competition coming soon.
Media_httpwwwnewmoney_siyoc

US ReDesigns Hundred Dollar Bill : Voice of America

The United States says it will debut a new design to the hundred-dollar bill next month.

In a statement Friday, the Treasury Department said it makes decisions about currency redesigns by evaluating "ongoing counterfeit threats."

The department said the new look will help protect against fraud.

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke will unveil the new look on April 21 in a special ceremony.

Details of how the bill will be different from the current version have not yet been released.  But the treasury department says it will launch a global public awareness campaign to make sure everyone is aware of the new security measures before the bill starts circulating.

The hundred-dollar note is the highest U.S. dollar denomination in circulation.  It is used by people around the world.

Filed under  //   Treasury Dept  

Change of Heart? : New Look US Currency on its Way

But not everyone is happy (extract from recent Atlanta Journal Constitution op ed post: The Barr Code).

Reach into your wallet for a five dollar bill in the near future, and you will likely pull out a much-downsized, multi-colored version of the venerable green bill with the visage of Abraham Lincoln printed thereon.  You will soon have to search in vain for uniformly-sized and colored tens, twenties, fifties or hundreds.  Is this dramatic change the result of Congress having passed a law requiring new designs for all currency bills larger than one dollar?  Nope.  It’s because of a special-interest lawsuit.

A little over three years ago, a federal court ordered the Treasury Department to begin the process of radically changing all US currency above the denomination of $1.  That decision was subsequently affirmed in 2008 by the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.  All this judicial decision-making is based on a 1970s-era federal law, the “Rehabilitation Act,” that was intended to extend civil rights to disabled individuals.   While this law had been employed in a number of areas to remove barriers to disabled persons seeking employment and access to various facilities and services, in 2002 an advocacy group – the American Council of the Blind (ACB) — filed a lawsuit interpreting the Act as requiring the government to design its currency in such a way as to be easily identifiable by the blind and the visually-impaired.

That lawsuit has now become the vehicle forcing a multi-hundred million dollar change in US currency.  Uniformly-sized and -designed US currency, which has served America well for so many decades, will soon be a relic of the past — but not because of action by the Congress or the President of the United States as representatives of the citizenry.  This change is being forced on the American people because of creative advocacy by a special-interest organization which was able to convince a handful of unelected federal appeals court judges to expansively interpret a federal statute, that arguably was not even intended to reach an issue such as currency design. 

The federal judges apparently were swayed also by the fact that many nations other than the United States already have switched to multi-sized paper currency incorporating all manner of visual and tactile identifiers.  The judges’ decision was arrived at notwithstanding that the number of people in the country who are actually blind is less than one-tenth of one percent of the US population of nearly 309 million, and even though other organizations advocating for the blind (such as the National Federation of the Blind) did not support the approach taken by the ACB. 

In short, this is another example of important public policy matters being decided not by the people’s representatives, but by shrewd advocacy groups and federal judges eager to interpret federal laws expansively and to leave their imprimatur far beyond the confines of the courtroom.  In the near future, when you search in vain for the uniquely American currency of uniform and professional size and design, and you find only oddly-shaped, multi-colored and highly-textured bills that are little different from bills circulated by other countries, remember you have a couple of unelected judges and powerful special interest groups to thank.

Filed under  //   Treasury Dept  

Paper Money that Works for the Blind : How Hard Could it Be?

This article originally appeared in the Chicago Tribune, by Beth Finke. Ms Finke illustrates a compelling vision of what it means to be brashly overlooked by our government and it's reluctance to simply fix the functionality of the US currency to make it easier for the visually impaired to use.

(image: rj55.com)

"I'm a published author. I fly around the country with my Seeing Eye dog to promote my books at schools and libraries. I appear at bookstores. I speak at conferences.

When we travel, Hanni – a golden retriever/Labrador cross -– guides me onto a shuttle to the airport. We manage our way through security at O'Hare International Airport, find our way down the jetway to our seats, get to baggage claim when we arrive at the next airport, hail a cab to our destination. I'm proud of my independence.

But you wanna know one thing I always need help with? Paper money. Dollar bills in my wallet are folded every which way to help me remember which is which. Twenties are folded in half, tens down to three-quarter size. Fives get the end folded into a triangle and singles I just leave be. I have to trust cashiers not to cheat me – I ask them to call out each bill as it's placed in my hand, then make them wait as I fold it and put it in my wallet.

Nearly180 countries use print paper money, and the U.S. is the only one that prints bills all the same size and color, no matter how much each bill is worth. Last year a federal appeals court ruled that the U.S. currency system discriminates against blind people. The court decision was not a unanimous one, and some high muckety-mucks weren't exactly happy with the ruling, either. The National Federation of the Blind, for example. NFB strongly opposed the 2002 lawsuit that led to the ruling. It figures that most blind people have found ways to cope with paper currency and say there are other, more pressing needs to address. 

Then-Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson testified against it too. He said the blind can function fine using credit cards or electronic scanners to identify different bills, and if that didn't work they could rely on help from others.

The NFB and Paulson do have a point. In the 20-plus years I have been blind, I have never been shortchanged by a cashier. Even Chicago cabdrivers – who have an undeserved reputation for being rude – have been honest with me, correcting me when I've made mistakes and tried to pay them too much.

Still, I feel pretty stupid sometimes when a bill unfolds itself, or gets mangled in my wallet, and I have to ask what money I'm carrying.

Changing the size or shape of U.S. currency wouldn't cost the Treasury much more than the changes it made in 1996 and 2004 to deter counterfeiting. The new system would not necessarily have to use Braille -- an embossed stripe on the $5, two stripes on the $10, that sort of thing would suffice. The American Council of the Blind has suggested distinguishing bills of different amounts by changing their size, adding embossed dots or foil to the paper or using raised ink.

The court case is supposed to pave the way for a future redesign of American paper bills, but the jury (literally) is still out. It's up to the federal government to decide whether to appeal the case to the Supreme Court. Until then, I guess those of us who are blind will have to continue relying on the kindness – and honesty – of strangers.

Beth Finke is the author of "Hanni and Beth: Safe & Sound." 

Filed under  //   Braille   Dollar   Treasury Dept  

Treasury Dept: Vending Machines Stand in the Way of Economic Recovery

(download)

THE SOLUTION TO OUR GLOBAL FINANCIAL CRISIS PALES INTO INSIGNIFICANCE

 In a letter we received over this last weekend, a spokesperson for the Treasury Department of the United States Bureau of Engraving and Printing said that, ‘the cost of reprogramming vending machines would be astronomically expensive and would also put many small manufacturers out of business,’ and therefore, it will not be possible to redesign the currency of the United States ‘at this time.’ Thank you.

However, according to a spokesperson for the National Automatic Merchandising Association (NAMA) ‘their members have had to make changes such as this in the past,’ for instance ‘when the Treasury revised the $5 bill.’ They also said that the cost to reprogram a machine is relatively small, approximately $500, or less, in their estimation – it’s not loose change, sure, but it’s not ‘astronomically’ expensive or financially crippling. As the NAMA spokesperson said, ‘these kind of changes would in fact be a cost that each vending machine owner could in theory write-off.’

‘The government’s bailout of Wall Street is estimated to cost approximately $23.7 trillion.’Neil Barofsky, special inspector-general for TARP ABC News

Regarding design, the Bureau said, unfortunately ‘aesthetic consideration’ is also not placed high on their agenda. Counterfeiting, security and worldwide familiarity ‘with a universally recognized’ bank note is actually their prime concern. In addition, advances in technology and reprographic techniques are also very important, as they should be. But printing processes and security devices are really just technical details, that are very important yes, and should definitely be part of any redesign for sure, but they do not answer the real issue which is that the Dollar’s brand ‘image’ has been broken and the world at large no longer believes in our stability. It doesn’t matter how many bells and whistles you throw at the manufacturing of our currency, if you don’t fix the brand then you’re simply wasting your time.

‘The existing set of reserve currencies, including the US Dollar, have failed to perform their functions. – Russian President, Dmitry Medvedev CNN Money

CLEARLY THEY’RE MISSING THE POINT.

When our campaign actually comes to fruition, everyone in the world will know about ‘our’ story: a ‘US initiative to redesign the Dollar currency as a means of stimulating our global economy’ – it would be on CNN, the BBC, it would be everywhere. Simply consider the global media frenzy over Michael Jackson. In the same way, it would be a story on every front page of every newspaper and every magazine cover for months and months, all around the world. It would be the biggest news story ever. It would simply be a story that would literally sell itself.

‘In 2002, the 4.4% jump in the Euro’s reserve currency status was the direct result of the introduction of Euro banknotes and coins in the same year and of increased international public awareness.’ – Wikipedia

Yes, of course it’s not just about the design. Of course security and public recognition are important, but the premise of our campaign has always been to ‘rebrand, rebuild and revive our country’ and to bring it back off its knees and give everyone a chance of hope and prosperity again. Really, these arguments against redesigning the US currency, in our opinion seem somewhat absurd. They are not insignificant by any means, but when you consider the bigger picture – stimulating the economy and rebuilding our country – these ‘issues’ could very easily be overcome. We figured out segregation, we put a man on the moon, we even put the first African American President in the White House. So why is rebranding and redesigning the US Dollar such a big deal?

THE BIGGER PICTURE – NO LONGER #1.

Towards a New Reserve Currency?

According to many global economists ‘the possibility of the Euro becoming the first international reserve currency’ is quickly becoming a reality. In September 2007, former Federal Reserve Chairman, Alan Greenspan, said ‘it is absolutely conceivable that the Euro will replace the Dollar as a reserve currency’ in the years to come. With more than €751 billion (Euros) in circulation, the Euro has become the currency with the highest combined value of cash in circulation in the world, surpassing the US Dollar.

‘Since its introduction, the Euro has become the second most widely held international reserve currency.’ – Wikipedia

No More Bad Debts Please.

In May, 2009, Russian news agency Pravda announced that Russia had ‘dumped’ the US Dollar as a basic reserve currency, thus loosing its status of basic reserve currency for the Russian Central Bank. In the New York Times, in March, ‘in another indication that China is growing increasingly concerned about holding huge Dollar reserves, the head of its central bank has called for the eventual creation of a new international currency reserve to replace the Dollar. Zhou Xiaochuan, governor of the People’s Bank of China, said a new system is necessary because the global economic crisis has revealed the “inherent vulnerabilities and systemic risks in the existing international monetary system”.’

‘Through its proposal, China was indicating that the Dollar’s long dominance was unfair, allowing the United States to run huge deficits by borrowing from abroad, and that the risks to holders of Treasuries were growing.’ – Nicholas Lardy, an economist and China specialist at the Peterson Institute in Washington – New York Times

SEEKING ‘RADICAL’ IDEAS, AGAIN

The Call to Action.

‘In FDR’s day, the notion that the US government could step into the economic fray of a depressed economy and provide what was hoped to be a far-reaching impact was something this country had never experienced. It was not only controversial it was radical even. Such a move by the government to take a deep, hands-on action to help turn the nation’s sinking economy around was unprecedented.’ – Dr Kristine McCusker, Associate Professor of History, TSU – Suite101.com

Request for Proposal.

‘Our client is looking for a way to pull them out of the gutter and put them back on the global map. Over the last few years, previous administrations and misguided worldwide initiatives have led to a break down of our client’s brand values and global stature. The result? Virtual bankruptcy, economic failure, social unhappiness, and quiet dissatisfaction: need we say anymore.’ – Chief Brand Strategy Officer and Special Advisor to the ‘Person in Charge.’

What Needs to be Done.

- Rebrand our broken vision. 

- Rebuild everyone’s livelihood. 

- Revive our failed economy. 

AND FINALLY

So is $500 really a lot of money? Yes, there are around 7 million vending machines in the US (Vending Times magazine), but when you consider the cost of the government’s bailout in comparison, isn’t $500 for each vending machine manufacturer actually a rather small sum? Yes, we are facing a global economic crisis, yes $500 IS a considerable amount of money to many people, but we also have to consider the global shortsightedness of such claims.

Media_httpwwwlegendvendingcomsitebuildercontentsitebuilderpicturesvendingmachinesfullbankblacksnackpopsodacombosgif_pniacyvzxjdfosj

ADDENDUM

When the Boot is on the Other Foot.

On March 13, 2008, the revised $5 bill was introduced. In a report online by the Daily News, Dawn Haley, Chief of the Office of External Relations for the Treasury's Bureau of Engraving and Printing, is quoted as saying:

'Any business that operates machines that accept $5 bills should contact the machines' manufacturers and ensure they get adjusted to accept the new design.'

End of story.

Filed under  //   Economy   FDR   President Obama   Treasury Dept